Péter Baki
On Home Ground
Károly Kincses & Magdolna Kolta: Hazai anyag. Fotónapló. André Kertész és a magyarok- Taken at Home. Photo Diary. André Kertész and the Hungarians. Hungarian House of Photography- Mai Manó House, Budapest, 2005. 271 pp.
...
André Kertész left Hungary, and was
probably right to do so: he became
world-famous. A fair few of the photogra-
phers who chose to stay at home were
noteworthy too- to mention only József
Pécsi, Károly Escher, Olga Máté, Dénes
Rónai, Rudolf Balogh... But need I say
more? Not one of them is known abroad
outside very specialist circles, yet if they
had left, they too, like Kertész, might fea-
ture in albums devoted to photography's
greats. Those who went abroad tend to be
known even to foreigners with only a mod-
erate interest in the subject. The likes of
Robert Capa, Brassai, László Moholy-Nagy,
Martin Munkácsi, György Kepes... Need
I add others?
It is hard to write anything new about
André Kertész. Many publishers around the
world have already put out albums of his
work; every phase of his life has been
combed over; and Kertész has said all there
is to say about himself in numerous inter-
views. Yet, if Hungarians really wanted to
know Kertész and his work before this
book came along, one thing was conspicu-
ously difficult to gain access to- the mate-
rial shot in his homeland, the taste of home
that Kertész very much carried with him
throughout his life. It is not just a matter of
the Kertész archives outside Hungary being
unable to respond if someone asks them
for the "Teleki Square" or "Kálvin Square"
pictures (the latter is entitled Budapest,
Spring, 1921 and features in the supplement of this issue); the photos themselves
mean nothing to them either, because they
are not in a position to locate the view
within a Hungarian reality. Many of the
photographs that Kertész took in the early
stages of his career can truly only be appre-
ciated through the eyes of a Hungarian.
In most of his public statements,
Kertész commented that he was using his
photographs as a means of keeping a diary.
That is the starting-point for this book, as
the authors have processed all of Kertész's
Hungarian "memories" in order to locate
all of the shots he made in Hungary or
which relate to Hungary. They carried out
some ingenious detective work to show us
the spots that Kertész visited and the sub-
jects that he photographed during his years
in Hungary. And not just those pictures
that were taken within the present territory
of the country, for quite a number were
shot within the wider bounds of the
Austro-Hungarian Empire and, indeed,
even further afield during Kertész's First
World War military service.
Kertész used to declare that it was not a
matter of photography altering his life
but of his life influencing his photography.
The book makes it clear that he was not
exaggerating: it really was like that. A
shortcoming is that it does not supply
(because no-one can yet supply) even an
approximately complete index of the pho-
tographs that he produced in Hungary.
Kertész' estate survives scattered in various
packages across the world. The biggest col-
lections are those in the keeping of the
Estate of André Kertész in New York and
the Mission Patrimoine Photographique in
Paris, but originals are also to be found in
the André Kertész Memorial Museum in
his native village of Szigetbecse and
the Museum of Photography in Kecskemét.
Now that this book has been completed,
we are in a position to appreciate that a mere fraction of all the pictures taken in Hungary are in our own field of vision. Under Kertész's will, his negatives, slides and documents were bequeathed to the French state. With close to one hundred thousand negatives alone, the pictures that feature in the book represent only a small part of this section of the oeuvre. The story is a typically Hungarian one, a
home truth. Towards the end of his life,
André Kertész asked the Budapest city
authorities to provide a pied-a-terre for him
to stay in whenever he came on a visit. He
did not have anything particularly grand in
mind: just an ordinary apartment that
would revert to the city after his death. In
return, he offered the Hungarian state a
substantial proportion of his life-work.
Seeing the hesitation on the part of the city
authorities, Kertész dropped his request,
and in the end no apartment was provided.
The country thereby managed to spurn him
a second time by failing to hold him for
what he could offer. While that was going
on, Paris placed at his disposal a small
apartment that he was at liberty to use
whenever his travels took him there. To the
best of my knowledge, he never stayed
there for any great length of time. The
upshot, however, was that the Mission
Patrimoine Photographique now holds
98,000 negatives, positives and other items,
including his personal notes, in a place
where the staff cannot speak Hungarian
and where translation is a painfully slow
business, undertaken by people who are
not experts.
Péter Baki
is Director of the Hungarian Museum of Photography.