Marianna Kiscsatári
Annus Mirabilis
The Year 1989 in Photos
Part 4
As 1989 Turned into 1990
As 1989 drew to a close, the party-state and state
socialism gradually ceased to exist in both a legal
and everyday sense. After a 40-year detour, Hungary
returned to the path marked out by István Széchenyi,
Lajos Kossuth and Ferenc Deák, the nineteenth-century
founding fathers of the Hungarian parliamentary state.
The National Round
Table Negotiations,
which began on 13 June
1989, concluded on 18
September with a broad
agreement making clear
that the elections scheduled
for 1990 would
take place without restrictions
on the basis of a
free contest between
parties—the de facto
launch of the election
campaign. Parties drafted
programmes and
held rallies in schools,
community centres and
on the street. Red stars
were torn down. Such
acts symbolised the irreversibility
of regime
change. The Socialist Workers’ Party (MSZMP), which had over 860,000
members in the mid-1980s, continued to shrink. Around 10,000 per month left
the
party throughout 1989 and fewer and fewer paid their membership dues.
Still, its membership was strong compared
with the new parties. The Party convened the
XIVth Congress for 6–9 October to decide its
future. Most of the 1,200 delegates were firsttime
participants who joined openly organized
platforms before the deliberations. The largest
of these was the Reform Alliance with around
500 members. The opposing "law and order"
conservatives formed several platforms.
Although the possibility of a split was mooted
repeatedly, in the end the majority chose to
stay together. Among the compromise
decisions, the most important, on 7 October,
was to end the MSZMP and form the MSZP, the
Hungarian Socialist Party. In subsequent
weeks, the dismantling of the state party apparatus
and the registration of new members
began. 
Laws were enacted to create the constitutional framework for a democratic
state governed by the rule of law. Two laws which came into force on
15 October 1989 were pivotal. The first amended the Criminal Code, the second
criminal procedure, and their essence was to narrow the scope of crimes
against the state and fortify individual liberties. Another law amended the 1949
Constitution and came into force on 23 October 1989 (a respectful nod to the
1956 Revolution). After the noontime tolling of bells on that same day, Speaker
of Parliament Mátyás Szűrös proclaimed the Republic on Kossuth Square (and
hence became acting president of the Republic). He cited Lajos Kossuth, Mihály
Károlyi and Zoltán Tildy as the forerunners of the renascent Hungarian
democracy. Thus the partystate
and state socialism
came to an end de jure.
After a forced detour of 40
years, Hungary returned to
the parliamentary system
whose foundations were
laid by the founding fathers
of the modern Hungarian
parliamentary state in
1848–1849. 
Parliament continued
ratifying the basic laws
of the new Hungarian
Republic. On 30 October,
another law made way for
the establishment of the
Constitutional Court. The
body, unprecedented in
Hungarian constitutional
law, was granted wideranging
authority. Members
were to be elected by Parliament
for a nine-year
term. The Court’s duties
included the preliminary
and subsequent examination of bills and acts of Parliament. It was to handle complaints about
violations of constitutionally guaranteed rights, interpret the Constitution and
end jurisdictional conflicts between central and local authorities. In defence of
the Constitution and constitutionality, the Court could nullify any act of
Parliament in violation of the Constitution or any government measure violating
the law.
The Constitutional Court thus acquired a privileged status in the system
of checks and balances. Its first president was László Sólyom, an internationally
known legal scholar and a former adviser to an environmental lobby group.
(Sólyom has been President of the Republic since 2007.) The body’s size was
eventually reduced from the originally planned 15 members to 11. Parliament
passed 58 acts in 1989, more than ten times the average between the years 1950
and 1985, and more than twice the number in 1988. With the establishment of
the constitutional framework, Parliament decided to dissolve itself on
21 December 1989, and effected the manoeuvre on 16 March 1990—not
without some grumbling from the predominantly Socialist deputies who had
been ‘elected’ in 1985.
The state budget came
close to collapse several
times in the course of 1989.
The planned figure for the
annual balance of payments
deficit was reached
within two months. In May,
the International Monetary
Fund announced its refusal
to release the final $350
million instalment under
an earlier agreed credit
agreement. Consequently,
the government decided to
devalue the forint twice in
succession (by 5 per cent in
March and 6 per cent in
April), to halt the Nagymaros
dam project in May,
and to submit new budgetary
amendments to
Parliament in June. These efforts were directed towards pushing down the
annual deficit to 20 billion forints, in line with the expectation of the IMF.
Further loans were sought from various organizations and banks. Success
came in the closing months of the year as various Western banks extended
immediate aid.
Imbalances were exacerbated by
a trade surplus within Comecon,
mainly in trade with the Soviet
Union. The government’s aim in this
area was to boost imports and
reduce exports in order to satisfy
growing domestic demand. In reality
the opposite happened. Hungarian
firms exported 500–600 million
roubles in excess of what they
imported. This was almost two and a
half times the 1988 figure. The basic
cause of the failure of this policy was
that most Hungarian industrial
goods could only be sold on the
Comecon market.
In order to avoid impending bankruptcy, on 18 September the government
tried to control foreign currency reserves held by the public by legalizing them.
When this failed, on 2 November it suspended the convertible currency allowance
for Hungarians travelling abroad for 17 days. At the same time, it was announced
that tourists travelling to the West could purchase at most $50 annually. Finally,
on 10 December the forint was devalued by a further 10 per cent.
In 1989 Hungary’s largest bus manufacturer Ikarusz had a workforce of
8,000. It used to produce 12,000 buses annually for the domestic market and
for export to Socialist countries, mainly the Soviet Union. The company faced
difficulties when these markets collapsed and technological limitations
circumscribed its competitiveness on western markets. Partial privatization
started in the autumn of 1989 assuring the Soviet Atex consortium a 30.4 per
cent share. Trade nevertheless continued to decline. A crisis management was
appointed to no avail, in spite of apparent interest from abroad. A consortium
headed by Gábor Széles produced a revival which proved to be fleeting.
(By
1995 the workforce had been reduced to 2,846 and the number of sold buses
dwindled to 1,574. Debts accumulated in spite of various reorganizations.
Ikarusz ceased operating on 31 December 2007.)
By dismantling barriers and allowing East Germans to cross freely to Austria,
Hungary literally tore a hole in the Iron Curtain. An estimated 10,000 ‘vacationing’
East Germans headed westward from Hungary (see Part 3 of "Annus
Mirabilis: The Year 1989 in Photos" in HQ 195), more than 2,000 between 21
and 24 August alone, the largest wave of emigration since the construction of
the Berlin Wall began in 1961. Others who sought refuge in West German
embassies in Prague or Budapest were taken by special trains to West Germany
in early October. By the end of 1989, the total number of GDR citizens who had
left the country stood at 345,000.
On 18 October, amidst countrywide demonstrations, Egon Krenz took over
as party general secretary from the hated hardliner Erich Honecker. His
concessions came too late. People took to the streets in the large cities and a
crowd of some half a
million people near the
Alexanderplatz in Berlin
demanded a complete
political change. The
entire leadership resigned.
On 8 November, the
German–German border
was opened both in and
outside Berlin. At midnight,
after hundreds of
people converged at
crossing points, permission
was given for gates
along the Wall to be
opened. The crowd
surged through cheering
and shouting and was met
by jubilant West Berliners
on the other side.
Ecstatic, they immediately
began to clamber on top
of the Wall and hack large
chunks out of the 28-mile
barrier.
The Berlin Wall came
down on 9 November
1989, heralding the reunification
process of the
two German states.
Due to the deteriorating economic situation, budgetary imbalance and, not
least, the expectations of an IMF threatening to withhold credit, the Németh
government submitted an extraordinarily strict budget to Parliament in
December 1989. It entailed price increases on an unprecedented scale. Miklós
Németh threatened to step down should the budget proposals be rejected. To
avoid this, Helmut Kohl, who came to Budapest to express his thanks to the
Hungarian nation for their help, appeared at the 18 December session of
Parliament and endorsed the proposal. It was probably thanks to him too that,
despite the heated debate, members finally passed the proposal by a large
majority on 21 December.
In Romania Nicolae Ceauşescu
ruled for nearly a quarter of a
century at the helm of the most
regressive regime in the entire
Soviet bloc. Brutal repression
went hand in hand with a
personality cult that perhaps
outdid Stalin’s. By the early
1980s, the standard of living had
sunk to unprecedented depths.
Permanent shortages led to food
rationing. The annual ration for a
family of three in Braşov in 1987
was 10.5 kg of sugar, 8.5 kg of
meat, 2.5 kg of flour, 10 litres of
milk and 10 eggs.
Despite the terror that kept
virtually everyone in dread, the
first cracks in the structure of the
Ceauşescu regime also appeared.
In March 1989, in an open letter,
six previously high-ranking state and party leaders condemned the "genius of
the Carpathians" for human rights abuses, the destruction of the economy and
illegalities perpetrated by the Securitate. In the spring of 1989, numerous
international organizations, among them the European Parliament and the
UN’s Human Rights Commission, condemned Ceauşescu, as did Eugene
Ionesco, the noted Romanian playwright who lived in France. Yet the biggest
breach in the regime’s façade, and the one which eventually led to its collapse,
was opened by László Tőkés, a previously unknown Hungarian Calvinist
minister in Timişoara (Temesvár).
László Tőkés was born in Cluj (Kolozsvár) in 1952. He was a successful
young pastor who eventually extended his criticism of the Reformed Church to
a condemnation of the entire Romanian regime. He spoke out in defence of the
rights of the Hungarian minority. In 1988, he condemned the village
systematization plan. The number of faithful who came to hear him preach
grew continuously in the autumn of 1989. The Securitate sought to frighten
him by every means available.
Tőkés had become a symbol of resistance and individual courage, and the
authorities finally decided to remove him from Timişoara by force. The date of
the eviction was set for 15 December. Tőkés resisted, and the multitude
gathered around his house forced the authorities to retreat. On the following
day a crowd assembled in the vicinity, forming a human chain in defence of
Tőkés and his family. By then the majority were ethnic Romanians. The
demonstrators removed the coat of arms symbolizing the regime out of the
centre of the flag and chanting the slogans—Freedom for Everyone! Down with
the Dictatorship! Down with Ceauşescu!—they overran the streets of the city
centre. They smashed the windows of bookshops and burnt Communist books
as well as pictures of the dictator. The Romanian Revolution had begun.
The Timişoara militia and Securitate acted brutally, beating and injuring
many. On the orders of Ceauşescu and his wife, armed forces began shooting
at demonstrators on 17 December, and this continued throughout the night
and on the next day. The number of victims exceeded one hundred.
László Tőkés and his wife in custody were taken to a small Transylvanian village.
Believing that the revolt was over, Ceauşescu travelled to Iran on 18
December for a three-day visit. Infuriated by the murders, 100,000–150,000
citizens of Timişoara —one third of the city’s population of 350,000—once again
took to the streets on 20 December. The military behaved passively on this day,
and a few of them in fact openly fraternized with the demonstrators. Then most
units disappeared from the city overnight. Even today, we cannot know for sure
whether they acted on local orders or on orders from Bucharest. On their own,
the Securitate did not dare confront the crowd. The Ceauşescu regime fell on
20 December in Timişoara. Overnight, the Action Committee of the Romanian
Democratic Front was formed, demanding the departure of the leadership in
Bucharest, and on 20–21 December it seized control of the entire county.
On returning home from Iran, Ceauşescu, unaware of the momentous
changes, in a televised speech on 20 December called the hundreds of
thousands of protestors in Timişoara "a few hooligans" and had summoned a
mass rally for the following day on the square in front of the presidential
palace. But the rhythmic applause and cheering to which he had become
accustomed in previous decades failed to materialize. The crowd began to
shout, at first barely audibly, then ever-more loudly: Timişoara! Rat! Death! We
Want Bread! Down with the Dictator!
Since TV broadcast the event live,
many were able to see first the confused,
and then the terrified facial
expression of the "Great Leader".
Ceauşescu attempted once again to
influence the crowd, with even less
success. A few took aim at him with
raw potatoes and their shoes. The
Conduca˘tor thereupon withdrew
inside the building, gave the order to
disperse the crowd at any cost, and
then, boarding a helicopter, fled the
city with his wife.
Chaos and confusion followed, but
by 23 December a National Salvation
Front Committee was formed. Various
declarations and the conduct of the
army eventually gave rise to the suspicion
that the Romanian Revolution
was perhaps not a revolution at all
but a coup d’état, the predetermined
schedule of which had been disrupted
by the uprising in Timişoara. Whatever
it was, it ended with Ceauşescu’s
hurried execution following summary
proceedings on Christmas Day,
25 December 1989, a sordid and
humiliating spectacle which, televised,
was watched by the whole
world with horrified disbelief.
The year of the first free elections started in with a political bomb. The fuse was
lit by the Alliance of Free Democrats (SZDSZ) and the Alliance of Young
Democrats (Fidesz) at a press conference on 5 January. They revealed that as late
as November and December, officers and secret agents of the notorious
Department III/III of the Ministry of the Interior had been keeping tabs on the
activities of more than 20 political parties and several well-known opposition
politicians. The reports were submitted to top officials. In the meantime, a largescale
project of document destruction was under way at the Department III/III
Files with agents’ reports and other sensitive documents were being
systematically shredded and records of what was destroyed were rarely kept. The
scandal, called "Dunagate",
was widely aired in the
media. It led to the resignation
of the Minister of
the Interior and several
top officials, and provided
further ammunition to the
Opposition parties in their
election campaign.
Amidst demonstrations and strikes protesting against the closure of factories
and soaring prices; and against the backdrop of the scandal in the Ministry
of the Interior, the Németh government made every effort to embrace the spirit
of the new age. Act IV of 1990, passed on 24 January, declared freedom of
conscience and religion to be a basic human right and established complete
legal equality among denominations. The law repealed agreements previously
reached with the Vatican under which the Pope could appoint Hungarian
prelates only with the prior consent of the Hungarian state. On 9 February,
Hungary established diplomatic relations with the Vatican—second only to
Poland among the countries of the Soviet bloc.
On 1 February, bilateral talks on the complete withdrawal of Soviet troops
began. The timetable for the withdrawal had to be made dependent essentially
on the capacity of the Hungarian railway junctions, mainly at Záhony-Cop. The
Hungarian negotiating team wanted the withdrawal of the troops to be
completed by 30 June 1991, something that Czechoslovakia had managed to
secure earlier. A drawn-out debate ensued, ending with Moscow accepting the
date proposed by the Hungarians. Although no settlement was reached on
financial questions, the agreement was signed on 10 March in Moscow by Soviet
Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze and Hungarian Foreign Minister Gyula
Horn. Also present were representatives of the Hungarian Opposition parties. 
The elections of 25 March and 8 April were a plebiscite of sorts passing
judgement on the Communist past. Twelve parties entered the elections. Six
parties dropped out after the first round having failed to cross the 4 per cent
hurdle. The Hungarian Democratic
Forum (MDF) obtained
43 per cent and the Alliance
of Free Democrats (SZDSZ)
24 per cent. Under Prime
Minister József Antall, the MDF
formed a centre-right coalition
government with the Independent
Smallholders’ Party
(FKGP) and the Christian
Democratic People’s Party
(KDNP) to command a 60 per
cent majority in Parliament.
The Socialists achieved a
humiliating 8.5 per cent and
the emerging liberal Alliance of
Young Democrats (Fidesz) an
impressive 6 per cent.
The elections completed a
peaceful process of political
and legal transformation, a
process which became known
befittingly as the "negotiated
revolution".
Marianna Kiscsatári
is curator of the contemporary section (1956 up to the present) of the Historical
Photographic Collection of the Hungarian National Museum, Budapest,
which holds all the photographs in this article except where otherwise indicated.
Much of the text accompanying the photos was based on
From Dictatorship to Democracy. The Birth of the Third Hungarian Republic
1988–2001 by Ignác Romsics (East European Monographs, No. DCCXXII.
Social Science Monographs, Boulder, Colorado. Atlantic Research and Publications,
Inc. Highland Lakes, New Jersey, 2007. Distributed by Columbia University Press,
New York, vii + 471 pp.).