Central Europe's best English-language journal (The Irish Times)
Current issue
Archives
VOLUME LI * No. 198 * Summer 2010
Home
About
Contact
Subscription
FAQ
Links

Archives

VOLUME LI * No. 198 * Summer 2010

 

Sviatoslav Richter in Hungary

János Mácsai Talks with Dezső Ránki

 

This conversation took place after the release of a fourteen-disc set of recordings of Richter's live performances in Hungary by Hungarian Radio and the Budapest Music Center. Richter had an enormous influence on Hungarian musical life. He first stepped onto a Hungarian concert platform in 1954 and his last concert was recorded by Hungarian Radio in 1993. In the four decades between, Richter regularly appeared in Hungary (sometimes without notice), giving sixty concerts altogether; twenty-eight in the capital and the rest in cities throughout the country either as a soloist, chamber musician or accompanist. Many pieces in the new set do not appear elsewhere. Richter was a major figure in the story of a generation of Hungarian pianists—Zoltán Kocsis, András Schiff and Dezső Ránki among them—who began their careers in the 1970s. Ránki, who knew Richter and assembled a large private collection of his recordings, contributed to the editing process.

Mácsai János: Clearly the box of 14 discs is especially interesting for anyone who attended his concerts. But what possible reason otherwise could there be for such a large-scale undertaking, given today's saturated CD market?

Dezső Ránki: I believe that Richter's playing on his recordings—not just in the flesh, so to speak—would have a profound effect on anyone, and that goes also for those who never heard him play live. Of course those of us who were present at his concerts could be wrong about this; though, as it happens, I do have childhood memories of listening to him on the radio, and I can recall what a phenomenal effect he had on me. And the impact he had on me when I was a twelve- or thirteen-year-old was no less strong than when I was in my thirties and forties. Those early impressions are still so vivid that I'm sure that a new listener today would have a similar reaction.

It's not by chance that Hungarian Radio and BMC asked you to select the material: you are not only among the obviously most qualified, but also a passionate collector of Richter recordings. It is likely that every one of his recordings has passed through your hands. How many Richter recordings do you have?

I can't say for sure because there are a lot of multiple releases, pirate recordings and so on. At any rate there are more than four hundred CDs of Richter. It is certain that over 250 are individual recordings. Very few were made in the studio; most are live performances. Although Richter was not terribly keen on the studio, for a period he did make a series of recordings there. This was untypical. But these studio performances exist and are very good, even if they lack the kind of spontaneity which sparks the same feelings as a concert does. There are the studio recordings of the Well-Tempered Clavier, lots of Schubert sonatas, smaller Tchaikovsky pieces and piano concertos. At any rate, it is not surprising that he didn't like making studio recordings. When he recorded the Liszt piano concertos with Kirill Kondrashin in 1961—if I remember correctly— he played one, as far as I know, in ten full takes and the other in eleven because he did not want them spliced. They are great performances. Only 25–30 CDsworth of studio performances exist altogether.
My work on the release started with my listening to all the recordings made in Hungary. I got all the material from Hungarian Radio and I compared them with all the recordings available. I compiled suggestions with certain criteria in mind, and, on this basis, ranked them using symbols I designed for the purpose. Top of the list was material which must not, by any means, be excluded because it was material which did not exist elsewhere. Next in line were performances which were particularly good or, from the point of view of the collector, important. There are those which, from the Hungarian perspective, are interesting but are lacking in some way or other, say, the recording quality. In any event, there are lots of things which I took into account, and I wrote down my opinions and handed over my list to Hungarian Radio. But the editing itself was done by them, mainly by Márta Perédi, I believe.

As far as I know, you have respected Richter's wish for what he himself did not want released or didn't allow to be broadcast. But was he always right?

Three such examples spring to mind. One was a concert in Győr in 1986 of which only the Diabelli Variations were allowed to be broadcast because the piano was so bad that it caused problems even for him in the other pieces. The second was a concert in the Vigadó, the Szymanovski sonata, which I think was very good, but unfortunately he did not allow it to be broadcast. Certain parts of the second volume of the Well-Tempered Clavier, which he gave permission for, appear. He specified which parts could be included and which could not.

Did you have suggestions which, in the end, did not get into the final release?

The Hungarian material is enough for around fifty discs; around one third made it to the final cut. It was impossible to know in advance how many discs could be pressed from the funds available. The number that appeared in the end was more than anyone could have counted on: fourteen discs. The first idea was to group the editions by the composers; but doing so would only have been justified on commercial grounds because discs are usually sold on shelves by composer. Luckily the recordings of the selected concerts follow each other chronologically. My feeling is that this works well and I agree with it.

Before you could have attended any of Richter's concerts, as a child learning the piano, you had certainly heard of him. Richter was a living legend in Budapest. What did they say about him in this period? And what was your experience of getting to know him?

I remember reactions of all sorts, some of them hostile because his playing was far from the style of the "good little piano student" which older piano teachers liked. But his playing had such a powerful effect that most people, whatever he did, accepted him. Besides the effect of his extraordinary personal charisma, the deepest impression he made on me was that everything happened precisely when it should have done when he played. He was musically concrete. There was none of this generally "beautiful playing" or the "beautiful formation" of phrases which play to audiences' expectations. Rather, his phrasing was exceedingly precise and every note and dynamic arrived exactly when they should have done. When you feel inside: right, now is the time to explode or now is the time to wane, it all happened just at the right time. For example, there is a stereotypical agogic when the first note is elongated. Even if it is only a melody comprising a few notes. This is mainly fashionable for string players but pianists have got into the habit, too. I personally think that after a while it gets really annoying because it puts everything out of joint and changes your expectations: after enough exposure to this kind of playing you come to expect it to happen and it no longer has any of its originally intended effect. It is not that I don't like this style because Richter doesn't do it but rather I myself feel this way, too. This is perhaps one of the biggest tasks that a musician must live up to. This kind of precision. The whole piece should unfold in such a way that every single detail within me is in its ideal place. This was one of the most important things which one could learn from him.

Richter with Éva Lakatos, Edit Klukon and Dezső Ránki With Zoltán Kocsis

[...]

 

Concerts and Recordings

 

Sviatoslav Richter's scrupulously kept diary shows that he gave almost 3,600 concerts and recitals during his career. He played over 800 works by around 60 composers, and his repertoire spanned the Baroque period to the contemporary. He performed every important piano concerto, and chamber music, too, was an essential part of his art.
In Budapest, he first performed in March 1954 in his 39th year, and 60 Hungarian concerts over four decades followed at more or less regular intervals. Besides Moscow, it was only in Czechoslovakia that he gave more. Richter took to the Budapest stage for the last time on November 9, 1993. He performed on 28 occasions as a soloist in Budapest and on 13 others in various Hungarian cities. He was a soloist with 11 orchestras and accompanied other soloists and singers—among them his wife Nina Dorliac, Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau and Yuri Bashmet—on eight occasions.
Budapest audiences were huge fans, and he gladly came to Hungary. With few exceptions, Hungarian Radio recorded everything that Richter played here. At the beginning, all his concerts and recitals were broadcast and later, too, there were a few. But from his 1973 Bach evening onwards, he did not permit live broadcasts. Only after a rigorous screening did he allow recorded concerts to be broadcast; after his concerts, he decided which could and which could not be included. The joint release by Hungarian Radio and BMC running to 14 discs respects Richter's intentions, and only recordings which Richter himself approved are included.
What marks Richter's repertoire is that he only played pieces which interested him in some way or other. With the exception of Bach's Well-tempered Klavier and the second volume of Debussy's Preludes, he never recorded or played entire series; not even if it was the composer's intention that the work should be played as a whole. So there is no complete version of his of Chopin's Etudes, for example, or the Preludes. Over the years, he managed to include almost every major work by Beethoven in his programmes, although he left several (and otherwise popular) works unrecorded, even some of the sonatas he otherwise often played. This selective approach is reflected in his Hungarian concerts, too, which have been edited with particular care. The points of view of atmosphere and style were determining factors. Musical considerations such as key signatures—even in encores—also played a part in how the series was assembled. The fourteen discs are a representative selection of Richter's art, and not only in terms of repertoire: they also reflect how Richter's playing changed over the decades. Richter is among artists whose performance style is exceptionally original, individual, and recognizable even after a few notes. Yet beyond this spiritual unity much changed, matured, crystallized and deepened during the course of his life.
A taste of the programmes on the 14 discs:
‘50s: Schumann A minor Piano Concerto (State Philharmonic Orchestra, Ferencsik), Bach Well-tempered Klavier, C Minor French Suite, Prokofiev's 8th Sonata, works by Ravel, Schubert C Minor Sonata, works by Liszt; ‘60s: Beethoven Op 22 B Major Sonata, Op 101 A Major Sonata, Schubert ‘Wanderer' Fantasy, Shostakovich Preludes and Fugues, Prokofiev Visions Fugitives, Chopin Scherzos, Debussy Preludes Vol. 1 and Rachmaninoff Preludes; ‘70s: Bach Well-tempered Klavier Vol. 2, Debussy Images Vol. 1, Schubert A Major Sonata, Beethoven Sonatas (Op 2/1 F Minor, 10/3 D Major, 14/1 E Major, 26 A Major); ‘80s: Works by Frank and Szymanovski, Tchaikovsky Piano Pieces, Rachmaninoff Études-Tableaux; ‘90s: Grieg Lyrical Pieces

 

 

János Mácsai
is a musicologist, a restorer of keyboard instruments and presenter for
MR3 Bartók Rádió, the classical music channel of Hungarian Radio.

 
Home Current Archives Contact About Subscribe FAQ Links
 
Hosting and design by Hungary.Network Inc.